Rembrandt the show-off!

Have you heard the one about “Rembrandt the show off”? This now popular tongue-in-cheek comment referring to the consummate ease with which Rembrandt was able to produce masterpieces, proves emphatically that in the whole history of art,  the truly miraculous can be achieved using just paint and brushes! For me this point is especially potent given the complex constraints that I know to exist in portraiture. Striving for excellence is commendable, and since it is impossible to actually know the true circumstances surrounding the relationships between Rembrandt and his patrons, I prefer to imagine him pushing the boundaries within the expectations of his customers as a portraitist - a magic trick if you manage to pull it off!, but most importantly within the boundaries of his chosen medium as an artist! I overheard a rather pompous remark made during a conversation at a local gallery recently that chimed so brilliantly with this blog; “art should not be constrained by its medium” the man said. Rembrandt demonstrably proves the opposite case, that the best art has the enduring quality of reflecting the medium with which it is created, it is constrained by it, and so defines a very human statement. The visual aesthetic speaks to us all in different ways, a moon, an expression, a colour, but pick a Rembrandt self-portrait, any self-portrait, and you will find it impossible to escape the fact that this is “hand made” using oil paints!

Here is my own homage to the most gifted painter who has ever lived - Rembrandt Study – 1987 (Oil on Linen, 24×18)

Posted in art history | 1 Comment

The Great Unfinished and Body Parts

When scratching around for new inspiration this year it occurred to me that maybe I should really exercise some discipline and actually finish works begun last year instead! Here is a “work in progress” portrait of my dad (Oil on Linen, 54×38). I’m in an uncomfortable place with this work where I am struck on the image in its crude form so much so that I dare not risk taking it to the next level – maybe there just isn’t one. When living at my parents home as a young boy at school trying hard to be like Picasso, I took to preparing small canvasses each portraying an individual body part rendered in fairly intricate detail. My big idea was to assemble these by displacing them on a blank ground in a form such that the less interesting connecting parts could just be imagined. The entire enterprise was based on the physiology of human vision where I had read that images taken in by the eye are actually quite limited,  concentrated on relatively small areas of focus, and that the brain fills in the bits in-between with something constructed using a form of cognitive perception…The Human Eye. I often find that unfinished works are intriguing for similar reasons; here you get to see what the artist instinctively considers to be initially significant – those little gems of gravitational pull to which most of us are drawn.

Footnote: my tiny bedroom was covered in experimental art and was invariably shrouded in the pungent smell of oil colours. I remember extending the “body parts” concept to include an impression of seafood having been inspired momentarily by photographs of food cut from magazines, but eventually the experiment ended badly due to my mother objecting to me nailing canvasses to my bedroom walls – even wood-chip wallpaper looks bad with holes in it!

Posted in work in progress | 1 Comment

Sutherland

I’m not convinced that I ever really grasped the importance of it – not really – well not until writing this blog maybe! spending all my pocket money on a biography of the artist Graham Sutherland, and feeling a proud sense of self-importance – yes indeed,  that I also could appreciate an artist’s work largely characterised in modernity. The fact is, it was the mix of Sutherland’s thorny brand of modernity and his amazing portraiture – pushed to the slightly comfortable side of modern art, that I found so compelling! This was just how I yearned to be! and here it was – the proof – me on a train – the book,  clutched hard to the chest – hardback, Faber and Faber!

Here is my impression from the dust cover – Graham Sutherland (Oil on Cotton, 30×20), 1982. The book is by Roger Berthoud.

Posted in contemporary | 1 Comment

Liquid Calm

When walking the dog this morning I noticed that that time of year when the first beginnings of the winter thaw had arrived. It was drizzling with rain and deadly still, and like a watched pan of water just on the hob, the expectation of change was ever so slightly simmering (a feeling often evoked through Turner’s famous watery contrasts!) My portrait shown here portrait (mixed media – Oil on Linen on mixed ground, 46×91), has the sitter in a mood of similar slightly disturbed serenity; a bit like Rothko – slightly nearer the powerful than the pretty!

Posted in contemporary | 1 Comment

Pontormo

An excellent documentary shown recently on television explored Giorgio Vasari’s book “The Lives of the Artists”. The show re-acquainted me with the work of Jacopo Pontormo whom I had admired since my early interest in Italian Renaissance painting. Jacopo da Pontormo (1494-1556) was a Florentine Painter who attracted much praise from leading contemporaries during his lifetime – the illustrious Michelangelo and Rafael included! Quotes like “he will exalt his art to the heavens” and “astonishing” and “cannot be bettered” illuminate the text of Vasaris treatment of Pontormo in his famous chronicle of Italian renaissance art. Unfortunately, comparatively few of Pontormos works described in “The Lives” survive today; but even from what little remains, it is clear that this body of work exudes the same natural confluence of aesthetic and draftsman-like qualities that in so many ways characterises the achievements of only a few of his contemporaries; distinguishing them in modern terms as great masters of art. My study detail (Oil on Card, 2009) shown here is painted from the much admired Deposition from the Cross which can be found in the Capponi Chapel, Santa Felicita. It’s curious to me that in the apparant insatiable quest of art scholars to “rationalise the intuitive”, this painting is categorised in the style of so-called Mannerism! I think it entirely fitting not to squeeze Pontormo into that particular box and leave the final word on that to Vasari who said, “his genius always went about investigating new conceits and extravagant ways of working, never resting content with any of them” Just look at paintings like Supper at Emmans and one of his portraits e.g., Portrait of Maria Salviati hanging on the same wall in the Uffizi, and you will not fail to recognise such vivid and compelling contrasts.

Posted in art history | Leave a comment

Hello World!

Hello everyone - this is my first post using my new blog. Please feel free to leave any comment on art, or my work, or anything else even vaguely related to the content of the website. The picture above is one of my earliest studio format oil paintings (Oil on Linen – 30×40) completed 80′s ish when first drawn to the art of the Pre-Raphaelites – rather longer ago than I care to remember! This example is after John Waterhouse.

Posted in getting started | 4 Comments

Two English Lions

In the red corner we have that old cockney geezer (JMW Turner) with his huge skies and his huge weather, and in the blue, the country gentleman (John Constable) who in contrast expressed a deeply personal view of the countryside but on such a scale as to transcend the essentially but surprisingly claustrophobic intimacy of his subjects. I have always been intrigued by the potential rivalry between these two lions as they grew obviously more expressionistic together as ageing RA’s! Was Turner just a natural? and is Constable’s part in this particular contest tainted with the legacy handed down to him by legions of chocolatiers? Anyway, there is my public expression of the most over used cliche in British Art history! Now that’s done, I wondered recently whether that comfortable view might be challenged by Constable’s painting of Waterloo Bridge exhibited at the RA in 1835 which is courageously expressive but arguably is a linear progression from his own landscape tradition, whereas Turner’s contribution in the same exhibition is somewhat weaker in its expressive ambition. This work is probably the nearest I have ever come to Constable’esk  - View from Meldon Hall, Northumberland (Oil on Linen, 36×48) As far as that old geezer is concerned, well his influence is woven like a thread through everything that I see!

Posted in art history | Leave a comment